3
دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتردانشگاه مالک اشتر
چکیده
سازمانهای دفاعیِ مبتنی بر فناوری برتر به دلیل ویژگیهای خاص مانند: وابستگی به نوآوری، اهداف راهبردی، اتکا به دانش کاربردی و ماهیت پویا، نیازمند توجه بیشتر به قابلیتهای متناسب با شرایط خود، از جمله قابلیت نوآوری میباشند. به همین دلیل در این پژوهش به بررسی اثر قابلیت نوآوری فناورانه (مشتمل بر قابلیت نوآوری محصول و فرایند) بر عملکرد محصول دفاعی پرداخته شده است. روش تحقیق از منظر هدف، اکتشافی و توصیفی و از منظر دستاورد، کاربردی است. در راستای بومیسازی متغیرهای ادبیات موضوع با سازمانهای دفاعی مبتنی بر فناوری برتر در ایران، از روش گروه کانونی استفاده و دادههای موردنیاز، در قالب پرسشنامه از 58 سازمان دفاعی حوزه الکترونیک جمعآوری شد. تحلیل نتایج معادلات ساختاری کمترین مربعات جزیی با استفاده از ابزار پی.ال.اس، نشان میدهد قابلیت نوآوری محصول و فرایند، موجب بالا رفتن کیفیت مدیریت فناوری میگردد. علاوه بر تایید معناداری مسیرهای مدل، نقش میانجیگری مدیریت فناوری در مسیر قابلیت نوآوری فرایند و عملکرد محصول دفاعی مورد پذیرش قرار گرفت. با توجه به یافته ها، پیشنهاد میگردد مدیران در راستای ارتقای قابلیت نوآوری فرایند و محصول در سازمان عمل نموده تا ضمن افزایش کیفیت مدیریت فناوری، عملکرد محصول دفاعی را از منظر راهبردی و پاسخگویی به نیاز مشتریان بهبود دهند.
دهقانی پوده، حسین. اخوان، پیمان. حسینی سرخوش، محمد، (1392). افزایش موفقیت توسعه محصول جدید مبتنی بر رویکرد نوآوری باز، مدیریت نوآوری، 2، 45-68
رضوانی، حمیدرضا، گرایلی نژاد، رزا، (1390). ارائه الگویی برای گونه شناسی انواع نوآوری سازمانی، فصلنامه پارک‌ها و مراکز رشد، 28، 21-26
زندحسامی، حسام، آشتیانی پور، زینب، (1392). تحلیل چگونگی تأثیر قابلیتهای نوآوری فناورانه بر رقابت پذیری شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط، مدیریت نوآوری، سال دوم، شماره 2، 1-24
فخرایی، مرضیه؛ صادق پور، علی اصغر، (1381). آیا بنگاه‌های کوچک می‌توانند با تمرکز بر نوآوری جایگاه مناسب خود را در بازار جهانی بیابند؟، رهیافت، 26، 96-103.
قاسمی نژاد، یاسر، (1396)، تبیین فرایند نوآوری فناورانه: از تولید تا تجاری سازی و انتشار ایده، فصلنامه رشد فناوری، سال سیزدهم، شماره 50، 29-40
مدهوشی، مهرداد؛ طبیبی، محمدرضا؛ دلاوری، حمیدرضا، (1392). بررسی اثر رویکرد بازار و رویکرد کارآفرینی بر روی نوآوری در بنگاه‌های متوسط و کوچک، مطالعات معاملات، 17(65)، 115-136
مرکز صنایع نوین، (1384). پروژه شناسایی نهادهای سیاستگذار و پشتیبان صنایع با فناوری برتر در ایران، تهران.
مقیمی درونکلایی، سیدنورالدین و علیزاده ولوکلایی، حسین رضا، (1389). بررسی تطبیقی رویکردها و چارچوب‌های سنجش نوآوری، فصلنامه رشد فناوری، شماره 23، 28-33
دانایی فرد، حسن؛ الوانی، سیدمهدی و آذر، عادل. (1383). روش شناسی پژوهش کمی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع. تهران: انتشارات صفار اشراقی. چاپ اول.
سکاران، اوما، (1386). روش‌های تحقیق در مدیریت، ترجمه: صائبی، م، شیرازی، م.، تهران: مرکز آموزش مدیریت دولتی.
دهقان، حسین، (1392)، برنامه‌های پیشنهادی وزیر دفاع به مجلس شورای اسلامی، سایت خبرگزاری فارس، 15/05/1392.
Aboelmaged, M.G. (2012), harvesting organizational knowledge and innovation practices: an empirical examination of their effects on operations strategy, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 712-734.
Azar,G. Ciabu schi, F. (2017). Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness, International Business Review 26 (2017) 324–336
Bi, K.X., Sun, D.H., Zheng R.F., & Li, B.Z. (2006). The construction of synergetic development system of product innovation and process innovation in manufacturing enterprises. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), Lille, France, 5-7 October 2006, 628–636.
Bunnell, T. (2002), Positioning Malaysia: High-tech networks and the multicultural rescripting of national identity. Political Geography 21, 105-124.
Camisón, C., Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities andfirm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2891–2902
Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2010). An examination of the relationship betweenmanufacturing flexibility and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 30(8).
Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R., Probert, David. (2009). Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities. Technovation, 29, 237–246
Cetindamar, D. Phaal, R. Probert, D. (2016). Technology management as a profession and the challenges ahead, J. Eng. Technol. Manage
Chiaroni, D. Chiesa, V. Frattini, F. 2011, The Open Innovation Journey: How Firms Dynamically Implement the Emerging Innovation Management Paradigm, Technovation, 31(1), 34-43
Coombs, J. E., & Bierly, P. E. (2001). Looking through the kaleidoscope: Measuring technological capability and performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, B1–B7
Coombs, J. E., & Bierly, P. E. (2006). Measuring technological capability and performance. R&D Management, 36(4), 421–438.
Damanpour, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size andmarket competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996–1010.
Damanpour, F. Evan, W.M, (1984). Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of "Organiza- tional Lag, Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 392-402
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization, and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17, 215–236.
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of Innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 650–675.
Davis L, (1982), New definition of ‘high-tech’ reveals that US competitiveness in this area has been declining, Business America 18 October pp 18–23
Drejer, A., (1997). The discipline of management of technology, based on considerations related to technology. Technovation, 17 (5), 253–265
Edler, J. Krahmer, F. M. and Reger, G. (2002). Changes in the strategic management of technology: results of a global benchmarking study, R&D Management 32, 2.
Fornell, C. G., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440-452
Fornell, C., Lacker, D.F. (1981). Evaluation structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50
Godin, B. (2002). Outline for a history of science measurement. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), 3–27.
Gill, d. N. (2009). The influence of invironmental and organizational factors on innovation adoptions: Consequences for performance in public sector organizations, Technovation, 29 (12), 810-818
Gima, K., Murray, J.Y. (2007). Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing, 15(2), 1-29.
Griffin, A., Price, R.L., Maloney, M.M., Vojak, B.A. and Sim, E.W. (2009). Voices from the field: how exceptional electronic industrial innovators innovate? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 222-240
Gu, Q, Jiang, W, Wang, G, (2016), Effects of external and internal sources on innovation Performance in Chinese high-tech SMEs: A resource-based Perspective, J.Eng.Technol.Manage, 40, 76–86
Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics,133,662–676
Han, Ch, Rhyn, S, Yang, M, Ieromonachou, M, Zhang, H, (2017), Evaluating R & D investment efficiency in China's high-tech Industry, Journal of High Technology Management Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2017.04.007
Hecker, D. E, (2005). High-technology employment: a NAICS-based update. Monthly Labos Review 7: 57-72.
Hirunyawipada, T. &. (2006). Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: implications for high technology product adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 182-198.
Hao, Sh., B. Yu. (2011). The Impact of Technology Selection on Innovation Success and Organizational Performance, iBusiness, 3 (4). 366-371
Henrad, D. Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. journal of markrting research; 38, 362-375
Horwitch, M., Stohr, E.A., (2012). Transforming technology management education: value creation-learning in the early twenty-first century. J.Eng. Technol.Manage. 29 (4), 489–507.
International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT). (2012). Accreditation Policy and Procedural Manual for Graduate Level Management of Technology Academic Program, IAMOT Inc., Miami
Jin, J. Zedtwitz, M. (2008). Technological capability development in China's mobile phone industry. Technovation 28,327-334
Kakati, M. (2003). Success criteria in high-tech new ventures. Technovation, 23(5), 447-457.
Kerr, C., Phaal, R., Probert, D. R. (2008).Technology insertion in the defence industry: A primer. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture August 1, 222, 1009-1023
Knight, K.E., (1967). A Descriptive Model of Intra-Firm Innovation Process, Journal of Management, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 478-96
OECD (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rded.). Paris: OECD EUROSTAT
Lee, J., & Slater, J. (2007). Dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial rent-seeking and the investment development path: The case of Samsung. Journal of International Management, 13, 241–257
Lio, S., Chang, W., Wu, C. & Katrichis, J.M. (2011). A Survey of Market Orientation Research (1995-2008). Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2): 301-310.
Marigo, N. Foxon, T. J. Pearson, P.J.G. (2010). Chinese Low-Carbon Innovation: eveloping Technological Capabilities in the Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing Industry, Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 2(3), pp.253 – 268
Medcof, J. W. (1999). Identifying'super-technology'industries. Research-Technology Management, 42(4), 31-36.
Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2010). Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: The role of organizational structure. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 820–831
Mishra, S. S., Saji, K. B. (2013). The impact of institutional variables in new high-tech product development processes:The moderating roles of perceived risk and project duration. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(2), 160 – 178.
Mothe, C., Nguyen Thi, T. (2010). The link between non-technological innovations and technological innovation. European Journal of innovation management, 13 (3), 313-332
Mumford, M. D. Zaccaro, S. J. Connelly, M. S. Marks, M.A. (2000). Leader ship Skills: Conclusions and Future Directions, Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), pp.155–170
Naranjo, D. (2009).The influence of environmental and organizational factors on innovation adoptions: Consequences for performance in public sector organizations, Technovation, Volume 29, Issue 12, 810-818
Noori, H. (1987), BENEFITS ARISING FROM NEW TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION: SMALL VS. LARGE FIRMS, 5(1), 8-16
Ortega, M. J. (2009). Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities’moderating role. Journal of Business Research.7.
Paladino, A., (2007). Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: A comparison of strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24 (6), 534–553.
Park, J. S. (2005). Opportunity recognition and product innovation in entrepreneurial hi-tech start-ups: a new perspective and supporting case study. Technovation, 25, 739–752
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P., Probert, D.R. (2004). Aframework for supporting the management of technological knowledge. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(1), 1-15
Santhapparaj, A.S. Sreenivasan, J. Loong, J.C.K. (2006). Competitive Factors of Semiconductor Industry in Malaysia: the Managers’ Perspectives, Competitiveness Review, 16(3&4), pp.197 - 211
Taylor, a., & Greve, H. (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 23-40
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodnessof-fit index for PLS structural equation modeling. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting (pp. 739-742). Padova, Italy: CLEUP.
Tenenhaus, M., Esposito Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48, 159-205.
Tsai, K. H. (2004). The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan's electronics industry. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15, 183–195.
Tuominen, M., & Hyvönen, S. (2004). Organizational innovation capability: A driver forcompetitive superiority in marketing channels. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 14(3), 277–293.
Unger JM, Rauch A, Frese M, Rosenbusch, N, (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: a meta- analytical review. J Bus Ventur 26:341–358
Van Wyk, R.J. (2011). A BODY OF KNOWLEDGE FOR MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY (MOT-BOK). Twentieth International Conference on Management of Technology
Vincent, L. Bharadwaj, S. Challagalla, G. (2004). Does Innovation Mediate Firm Performance? A Meta-Analysis of Determinants and Consequences of Organizational Innovation, Working Paper, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Walker, R. M. (2004). Innovation and Organisational Performance: Evidence and a Research Agenda. Retreived 01.07.15, [from] http://www.aimresearch.org
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate Entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43–58.
Zemlickiene, V. (2011). Analysis of High-technology Product development Models. Intellectual Economics, 2(10), 283–297
Zhang, J. & Duan, Y. (2010). Empirical study on the impact of market orientation and innovation orientation on new product performance of Chinese manufacturers. Nankai Business Review International; 1(2): 214-231.
Zhijie, G. Jie, J. Ping, L. (2011). Design and Application of Evaluation Model on Technical Innovation Ability of SMEs based on AHP and FCE, 7th International Conference on Innovation & Management, China.
Bauer, J. M., Lang, A., Schneide, V. (2011). Innovation Policy andGovernance in High-TechIndustries: The Complexity of Coordination.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business press.
Chin, W.W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In ModernMethods for Business Research, Marcoulides,A. (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1295-1336.
Crawford, C. M. Di Benedetto, A. (2015), New Products Management, 11 edition
Daim, T., Cetindamar, D., Beyhan, Berna, Basoglu, N. (2013). Strategic Planning Decisions in the High Tech Industry. London: Springer,1-5
Klincewicz, K. (2005). Strategic alliances in the high-tech industry. Berlin: Logos Verlag.
Porter, M. E, (2003). Building the Microeconomic Foundations of Competitiveness Report 2002-2003, World Economic Forum, New York, Oxford University Press
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Viardot, E. (2004). Successful Marketing Strategy for High-Tech Firms (Third edition). Artech House Inc.
Zhang, J. (2003). High-Tech start-Ups and industry dynamics in Silicon Valley. Public Policy Institute of California
)